Dog Walkers & Pet Sitters in Hampton, New Hampshire

How to hire a dog walker in Hampton

Treat the meet-and-greet like an interview. Ask to see proof of insurance and any pet first-aid certification, ask for two client references you can actually call, and confirm how keys are handled (a written key agreement is the professional standard). Watch how the walker greets your dog — a good one gets low and lets the dog approach. Agree in writing on the exact service, rate, cancellation policy, and the emergency plan (which vet, who they call).

New Hampshire state dog laws

New Hampshire has one of the broadest strict-liability dog statutes in the country — it names whoever "owns, keeps, or possesses" the dog, covers non-bite injuries, and applies even if the dog was leashed.

These state-level rules apply across New Hampshire; the local rules that govern day-to-day walking are on the Local bylaws tab.

Dog bites: broad strict liability (RSA 466:19)

New Hampshire (RSA 466:19) has one of the oldest and broadest dog statutes in the country (roots to 1851). It makes the person who owns, keeps, or possesses the dog liable for any damage the dog causes to a person or property — no vicious requirement, no prior history, no knowledge, and no negligence needed. The only statutory carve-out is that there is no recovery if the victim was committing a trespass or other tort. Because it names owns, keeps, or possesses, a walker who possesses or keeps the dog is a named strictly-liable party.

Non-bite injuries & the leashed-dog breadth (Bohan v. Ritzo)

It is genuinely broad. In Bohan v. Ritzo (1996), the NH Supreme Court held liability extends to any injury from a dog's conduct — being knocked down, chased, or frightened into falling (there, a cyclist who flipped his bike) — because nothing in the statute limits it to an actual bite. And it applies even if the dog was leashed or confined — location and restraint do not matter to strict liability.

Defenses & time limit

The defenses are the victim committing a trespass or other tort, and a limited comparative causation rule (Bohan) that applies only if the victim provoked the dog or knowingly put themselves in danger — a higher bar than ordinary comparative negligence. At-large and nuisance rules are in RSA 466:31. The personal-injury limit is three years.